蔺建宇, 崔臣, 高艳平, 等. 加速康复外科在老年肝移植受者围手术期临床应用中的效果[J]. 器官移植, 2023, 14(2): 288-294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.016
引用本文: 蔺建宇, 崔臣, 高艳平, 等. 加速康复外科在老年肝移植受者围手术期临床应用中的效果[J]. 器官移植, 2023, 14(2): 288-294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.016
Lin Jianyu, Cui Chen, Gao Yanping, et al. Effect of perioperative clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery on elderly recipients undergoing liver transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 14(2): 288-294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.016
Citation: Lin Jianyu, Cui Chen, Gao Yanping, et al. Effect of perioperative clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery on elderly recipients undergoing liver transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 14(2): 288-294. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2023.02.016

加速康复外科在老年肝移植受者围手术期临床应用中的效果

Effect of perioperative clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery on elderly recipients undergoing liver transplantation

  • 摘要:
      目的  探索加速康复外科(ERAS)指导下的围手术干预策略在老年肝移植受者中的应用价值。
      方法  回顾性分析405例肝移植受者的临床资料,根据年龄分为老年组(≥60岁,122例)和非老年组(< 60岁,283例),所有患者均进行ERAS指导下的围手术期干预处理,分析两组受者术中、术后相关指标,并发症发生情况及出院情况。
      结果  两组受者麻醉时间,手术时间,无肝期,出血量,输血量,关腹前乳酸水平,呼吸机辅助时间,重症监护室(ICU)入住时间,Caprini评分,CHIPPS评分,胃管、尿管、引流管拔除时间,首次饮水时间,首次下地活动时间和首次肛门排气时间差异均无统计学意义(均为P > 0.05),老年组首次进食时间晚于非老年组(P < 0.05)。两组受者发热、腹腔积液、肺部感染、胃排空障碍、出血、非活动性静脉血栓发生率差异均无统计学意义(均为P > 0.05)。两组受者出院前天冬氨酸转氨酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、血清肌酐水平及总住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均为P > 0.05);老年组受者丙氨酸转氨酶值比非老年组低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。非老年组与老年组受者术后30 d内均无非计划再次手术发生,出院后30 d内再入院率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论  ERAS干预策略有助于老年肝移植受者围手术期的恢复,达到与非老年肝移植受者同等的术后恢复水平。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To evaluate the application value of perioperative interventional strategy guided by enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elderly recipients undergoing liver transplantation.
      Methods  Clinical data of 405 liver transplant recipients were retrospectively analyzed. According to age, all recipients were divided into the elderly (≥60 years, n=122) and non-elderly groups (< 60 years, n=283). All patients received perioperative interventions under the guidance of ERAS. Intraoperative and postoperative indexes, incidence of postoperative complications and discharge were analyzed between two groups.
      Results  There were no significant differences in the duration of anesthesia, operation time, anhepatic phase, hemorrhage volume, blood transfusion volume, lactic acid level before abdominal closure, ventilator-assisted time, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, Caprini score, CHIPPS score, time of gastric tube, urinary tube and drainage tube removal, time to first drinking, time to first physical activity and time to first flatus between two groups (all P > 0.05). In the elderly group, the time to first feeding was later than that in the non-elderly group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of fever, ascites, pulmonary infection, delayed gastric emptying, hemorrhage and inactive venous thrombosis between two groups (all P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the levels of aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, serum creatinine before discharge and total length of hospital stay between two groups (all P > 0.05). The alanine aminotransferase level in elderly recipients was lower than that in non-elderly counterparts, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No unplanned reoperation was performed within postoperative 30 d in two groups. There was no significant difference in the re-hospitalization rate within 30 d after discharge (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions  ERAS-guided interventional strategy contributes to perioperative recovery of elderly recipients undergoing liver transplantation, and yields equivalent postoperative recovery between elderly and non-elderly recipients.

     

/

返回文章
返回