供者来源性感染对肝移植受者预后的影响

Effect of donor-derived infection on prognosis of liver transplant recipients

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨供者来源性感染对肝移植受者预后的影响。
      方法  分析75例行肝移植供、受者临床资料。根据供者器官灌洗液培养结果,将受者分为阳性组(26例)和阴性组(49例)。观察阳性组和阴性组受者围手术期相关临床指标,对肝移植受者痰液、腹腔引流液进行培养,观察受者术后感染情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析受者术后1.5年的生存曲线。
      结果  阳性组受者门静脉狭窄和门静脉血栓的发生率明显高于阴性组受者(P < 0.05)。75例肝移植受者中,发生术后感染者33例(44%),受者发生感染的部位以肺部和腹腔为主,阳性组和阴性组的感染率分别为77%、27%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。阳性组中,痰液、腹腔引流液培养阳性分别为10例、11例,其中4例受者痰培养结果与其供者器官灌洗液培养结果一致,6例受者腹腔引流液培养结果与其供者器官灌洗液培养结果一致。经过抗感染治疗后,阳性组中2例受者分别于术后5、12 d死亡,其余受者的培养结果均转阴。阴性组中,痰液、腹腔引流液培养阳性分别为7例、6例,经抗感染治疗后培养结果均转阴,2例受者因移植物肝衰竭分别于术后1个月、1年死亡。阳性组和阴性组受者移植术后1.5年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论  供者来源性感染对肝移植受者早期预后的影响不可忽视,但对中晚期预后影响不大。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To evaluate the effect of donor-derived infection on the clinical prognosis of the recipients undergoing liver transplantation.
      Methods  Clinical data of 75 donors and recipients undergoing liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. According to the culture results of donor organ lavage fluid, all recipients were divided into the positive group (n=26) and negative group (n=49). Clinical parameters of the recipients during perioperative period were observed in the positive and negative groups. The sputum and peritoneal drainage fluid of the recipients undergoing liver transplantation were cultured. The incidence of postoperative infection of the recipients was observed. The 1.5-year survival curve of the recipients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.
      Results  In the positive group, the incidence of portal vein stenosis and thrombosis was significantly higher than that in the negative group (P < 0.05). Among 75 recipients undergoing liver transplantation, 33 cases (44%) developed postoperative infection mainly in the lung and abdominal cavity. The infection rate significantly differed between the positive group (77%) and negative group (27%, P < 0.05). In the positive group, sputum culture was positive in 10 recipients and peritoneal drainage culture was positive in 11 recipients. The sputum culture outcomes of 4 recipients were consistent with those of the organ lavage fluid culture of their donors. The peritoneal drainage culture results of 6 recipients were consistent with those of the organ lavage fluid culture of their donors. After anti-infection treatment, 2 recipients in the positive group died at postoperative 5 and 12 d, and the culture results of the remaining recipients were negative. In the negative group, 7 recipients were positive for sputum culture and 6 recipients were positive for peritoneal drainage culture. The culture results of all recipients were negative following anti-infection therapy. Two recipients died from graft failure at postoperative 1 month and 1 year. The 1.5-year survival rate did not significantly differ between the positive and negative groups (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions  The effect of donor-derived infection on the early prognosis of liver transplant recipients cannot be neglected, whereas it exerts mild impact on the intermediate- and long-term clinical prognosis of the recipients.

     

/

返回文章
返回