超声造影评估脑死亡器官捐献供肾对移植肾功能延迟恢复的预测价值

Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating delayed graft function in kidneys from donation after brain death

  • 摘要:
    目的  探讨超声造影(CEUS)定量参数评估脑死亡器官捐献(DBD)供肾对受者发生移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)的预测价值。
    方法 回顾性分析134例DBD供者及对应202例肾脏和受者的临床资料,根据肾移植术后肾功能将受者分为DGF组(39例)和非DGF组(163例),比较两组常规超声、CEUS参数及临床资料。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以最高约登指数确定CEUS、临床参数及两者联合预测DGF的最佳截取值,评价不同参数预测DGF的能力。
    结果 两组肾皮质峰值强度(PIc)、肾髓质峰值强度(PIm),供者白蛋白(ALB)、入院后首次血清肌酐(Scr),受者Na+浓度差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。CEUS参数PIc、PIm联合以及PIc、PIm联合临床参数预测DGF的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.711和0.808,最佳截取值为0.193和0.191,约登指数为0.382和0.517,灵敏度为0.769和0.769,特异度为0.613和0.748。后者预测DGF的AUC高于前者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论 CEUS定量参数PIc、PIm评估DBD供肾对受者DGF有良好的预测价值,联合临床参数的诊断效能更佳。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the predictive value of quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating kidneys from donation after brain death (DBD) for the occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) in recipients.
    Methods The clinical data of 134 DBD donors and 202 corresponding kidneys and recipients were retrospective analyzed. The recipients were divided into DGF group (n=39) and non-DGF group (n=163) according to the renal function after kidney transplantation. Conventional ultrasound, CEUS parameters, and clinical data were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting DGF using CEUS parameters, clinical parameters, and their combination, based on the highest Youden index. The predictive ability of different parameters for DGF was evaluated.
    Results There were statistically significant differences in cortical peak intensity (PIc), medullary peak intensity (PIm), donor albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (Scr) after admission, and the Na+ concentration of recipients between the two groups (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting DGF using the combination of CEUS parameters PIc and PIm was 0.711, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.193 and a Youden index of 0.382. The AUC for predicting DGF using the combination of CEUS parameters PIc, PIm and clinical parameters was 0.808, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.191 and a Youden index of 0.517. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.769 and 0.613 for the former, and 0.769 and 0.748 for the latter, respectively. The AUC for predicting DGF using CEUS parameters PIc and PIm combined with clinical parameters was significantly higher than that using CEUS parameters PIc and PIm (P<0.05).
    Conclusions The CEUS quantitative parameters PIc and PIm have good predictive value in assessing kidneys from DBD donors for DGF in recipients, and the diagnostic efficacy is better when combined with clinical parameters.

     

/

返回文章
返回