Volume 12 Issue 2
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Li Xin, Sun Zejia, Cai Jifei, et al. Clinical application of biomarkers in DCD donor kidney perfusate for predicting delayed graft function after renal transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 12(2): 209-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2021.02.012
Citation: Li Xin, Sun Zejia, Cai Jifei, et al. Clinical application of biomarkers in DCD donor kidney perfusate for predicting delayed graft function after renal transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 12(2): 209-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2021.02.012

Clinical application of biomarkers in DCD donor kidney perfusate for predicting delayed graft function after renal transplantation

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2021.02.012
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Wang Wei, Email: weiwang0920@163.com
  • Received Date: 2020-12-20
    Available Online: 2021-03-19
  • Publish Date: 2021-03-15
  •   Objective  To explore the feasibility of biomarkers in static cold storage (SCS) perfusate of donor kidney from donation after cardiac death (DCD) for predicting delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation.  Methods  Clinical data of 64 recipients and 47 donors undergoing DCD renal transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. All recipients were divided into the DGF group (n=7) and immediate graft function (IGF) group (n=57) according to the incidence of postoperative DGF in the recipients. The levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), interleukin -18(IL-18) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in the SCS perfusate were statistically compared between two groups, and the correlation with DGF was analyzed. The predictive value of each biomarker in the occurrence of DGF in recipients after renal transplantation was analyzed.  Results  The incidence of DGF in the recipients undergoing DCD renal transplantation was 11% (7/64). The NGAL level in the donor kidney perfusate of the DGF group was significantly higher than that in the IGF group (P=0.009). The NGAL level in the donor kidney perfusate was positively correlated with the incidence of DGF in recipients after renal transplantation (r=0.430, P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the increased levels of NGAL and KIM-1 in the perfusate yielded certain predictive value for DGF in recipients after renal transplantation (both P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of combined detection of NGAL and KIM-1 for predicting DGF in recipients after renal transplantation was 0.932 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.850-1.000]. The sensitivity was calculated as 1.000 and 0.754 for the specificity (P < 0.05).  Conclusions  The NGAL level in the SCS perfusate of DCD donor kidney is associated with the occurrence of DGF in recipients after renal transplantation. Combined detection of NGAL and KIM-1 levels in the perfusate may accurately predict the occurrence of DGF in recipients after renal transplantation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    VAN SMAALEN TC, BEURSKENS DM, HOOGLAND ER, et al. Presence of cytotoxic extracellular histones in machine perfusate of donation after circulatory death kidneys[J]. Transplantation, 2017, 101(4): e93-e101. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001590.
    [2]
    VAN DEN AKKER EK, HESSELINK DA, MANINTVELD OC, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, but not kidney injury marker 1, correlates with duration of delayed graft function[J]. Eur Surg Res, 2015, 55(4): 319-327. DOI: 10.1159/000440718.
    [3]
    PARIKH CR, HALL IE, BHANGOO RS, et al. Associations of perfusate biomarkers and pump parameters with delayed graft function and deceased donor kidney allograft function[J]. Am J Transplant, 2016, 16(5): 1526-1539. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13655.
    [4]
    GAVRⅡLIDIS P, INSTON NG. Recipient and allograft survival following donation after circulatory death versus donation after brain death for renal transplantation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Transplant Rev (Orlando), 2020, 34(4): 100563. DOI: 10.1016/j.trre. 2020.100563.
    [5]
    BUTALA NM, REESE PP, DOSHI MD, et al. Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? instrumental variable analysis[J]. Transplantation, 2013, 95(8): 1008-1014. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182855544.
    [6]
    LIM WH, JOHNSON DW, TEIXEIRA-PINTO A, et al. Association between duration of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and allograft outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2019, 103(2): 412-419. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002275.
    [7]
    BAHL D, HADDAD Z, DATOO A, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2019, 24(1): 82-86. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000604.
    [8]
    MIRET ALOMAR E, TRILLA HERRERA E, LORENTE GARCIA D, et al. Systematic review of kidney transplantation functional predictors[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2018, 42(4): 218-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.004.
    [9]
    KIEVIT JK, NEDERSTIGT AP, OOMEN AP, et al. Release of alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha GST) and pi-glutathione S-transferase (pi GST) from ischemic damaged kidneys into the machine perfusate--relevance to viability assessment[J]. Transplant Proc, 1997, 29(8): 3591-3593. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(97)01036-1.
    [10]
    VANMASSENHOVE J, VANHOLDER R, NAGLER E, et al. Urinary and serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury: an in-depth review of the literature[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013, 28(2): 254-273. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs380.
    [11]
    QURASHI S, GHAMDI G, JARADAT M, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and the occurrence of delayed graft function after kidney transplant[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2014, 12(5): 396-400. DOI: 10.6002/ect.2013.0300.
    [12]
    GARCIA-ALVAREZ M, GLASSFORD NJ, BETBESE AJ, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as predictor of short- or long-term outcomes in cardiac surgery patients[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2015, 29(6): 1480-1488. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.05.060.
    [13]
    GÓMEZ-DOS-SANTOS V, RAMOS-MUÑOZ E, GARCÍA-BERMEJO ML, et al. MicroRNAs in kidney machine perfusion fluid as novel biomarkers for graft function. normalization methods for miRNAs profile analysis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(2): 307-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.09.019.
    [14]
    LI YM, LI Y, YAN L, et al. Comparison of urine and blood NGAL for early prediction of delayed graft function in adult kidney transplant recipients: a Meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1): 291. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1491-y.
    [15]
    QUINTELLA AHDS, LASMAR MF, FABRETI-OLIVEIRA RA, et al. Delayed graft function, predictive factors, and 7-year outcome of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with different immunologic profiles[J]. Transplant Proc, 2018, 50(3): 737-742. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.007.
    [16]
    MOERS C, VARNAV OC, VAN HEURN E, et al. The value of machine perfusion perfusate biomarkers for predicting kidney transplant outcome[J]. Transplantation, 2010, 90(9): 966-973. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f5c40c.
    [17]
    HOOGLAND ER, DE VRIES EE, CHRISTIAANS MH, et al. The value of machine perfusion biomarker concentration in DCD kidney transplantations[J]. Transplantation, 2013, 95(4): 603-610. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827908e6.
    [18]
    DE KOK MJC, SCHAAPHERDER AFM, ALWAYN IPJ, et al. Improving outcomes for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation: science of the times[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e0236662. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236662.
    [19]
    CHEN R, WANG H, SONG L, et al. Predictors and one-year outcomes of patients with delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2020, 21(1): 526. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-02181-1.
    [20]
    WALLS DO, LEE-RIDDLE GS, BOVER MANDERSKI M, et al. Kidney transplant outcomes from donation after circulatory death donors of advanced age[J]. Clin Transplant, 2020, 34(7): e13881. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13881.
    [21]
    NASHAN B, ABBUD-FILHO M, CITTERIO F. Prediction, prevention, and management of delayed graft function: where are we now?[J]. Clin Transplant, 2016, 30(10): 1198-1208. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12832.
    [22]
    SAHRAEI Z, SALAMZADEH J, NAFAR M. Effect of N-acetyl cysteine and vitamin C on kidney allograft function biomarkers interleukin-18 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin[J]. Iran J Kidney Dis, 2015, 9(1): 56-62.
    [23]
    YADAV B, PRASAD N, AGRAWAL V, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 can predict delayed graft function in living donor renal allograft recipients[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2015, 20(11): 801-806. DOI: 10.1111/nep.12511.
    [24]
    KOSTIDIS S, BANK JR, SOONAWALA D, et al. Urinary metabolites predict prolonged duration of delayed graft function in DCD kidney transplant recipients[J]. Am J Transplant, 2019, 19(1): 110-122. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14941.
    [25]
    LI F, HU L, ZHAO X, et al. The value of cystatin C and urinary and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin during the perioperative period of renal transplantation[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2019, 8(5): 432-441. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.12.
    [26]
    TRUCHE AS, TROCME C, VERGNAUD S, et al. Early prediction of graft outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after circulatory death: biomarkers and transplantation characteristics[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(10): 3234-3243. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.09.009.
    [27]
    WILLIAMS KR, COLANGELO CM, HOU L, et al. Use of a targeted urine proteome assay (TUPA) to identify protein biomarkers of delayed recovery after kidney transplant[J]. Proteomics Clin Appl, 2017, 11(7/8). DOI: 10.1002/prca.201600132.
    [28]
    HAMAR M, SELZNER M. Ex-vivo machine perfusion for kidney preservation[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2018, 23(3): 369-374. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000524.
    [29]
    CAPPUCCILLI M, CAPELLI I, COMAI G, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a biomarker of allograft function after renal transplantation: evaluation of the current status and future insights[J]. Artif Organs, 2018, 42(1): 8-14. DOI: 10.1111/aor.13039.
    [30]
    MOSER MAJ, SAWICKA K, ARCAND S, et al. Proteomic analysis of perfusate from machine cold perfusion of transplant kidneys: insights into protection from injury[J]. Ann Transplant, 2017, 22: 730-739. DOI: 10.12659/aot.905347.
    [31]
    VAN SMAALEN TC, HOOGLAND ER, VAN HEURN LW. Machine perfusion viability testing[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2013, 18(2): 168-173. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32835e2a1b.
    [32]
    KOO TY, JEONG JC, LEE Y, et al. Pre-transplant evaluation of donor urinary biomarkers can predict reduced graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(11): e3076. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003076.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (967) PDF downloads(59) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return